In a significant development for California’s real estate investors, the Los Angeles “mansion tax”—officially known as Measure ULA—is at the center of a statewide tax reform initiative. The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, a prominent low-tax advocacy group, is gathering signatures to place a measure on the November 2026 ballot. This proposed constitutional amendment seeks to cap real estate transfer taxes and raise the voter approval threshold for certain local tax measures, potentially reshaping the landscape for real estate transactions and development across the state.
Measure ULA: A Closer Look
Implemented in 2023, Measure ULA imposes elevated transfer tax rates on high-value property sales in Los Angeles. Properties sold for $5 million to $10 million are taxed at 4%, while those exceeding $10 million face a 5.5% rate. In contrast, sales below these thresholds are taxed at approximately 0.5%. Since its enactment, Measure ULA has generated over $830 million, funding affordable housing projects, tenant subsidies, and legal assistance for renters facing eviction.
While supporters argue that the measure addresses the city’s homelessness crisis, critics contend that the increased tax burden has deterred new apartment construction, exacerbating the housing shortage in Los Angeles.
Statewide Implications
The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association’s proposed amendment targets two key areas:
Real Estate Transfer Taxes: The amendment proposes capping transfer tax rates at approximately 0.05% of a property’s sale value. This is significantly lower than Los Angeles’ current highest rate of 5.5%.
Local Tax Measures: The proposal seeks to increase the voter approval threshold for local tax measures initiated by citizens—from a simple majority to a two-thirds supermajority.
If passed, this amendment could limit the ability of local governments to fund housing and infrastructure projects through voter-approved taxes, potentially leading to a reduction in resources for such initiatives.
What This Means for Investors
For real estate investors, particularly those involved in high-value transactions or development projects in California, the outcome of this proposed amendment could have significant financial implications. A cap on transfer taxes could reduce transaction costs, potentially making high-value properties more attractive investments. However, the increased difficulty in passing local tax measures could lead to reduced funding for public services and infrastructure, potentially affecting the desirability and profitability of certain investment areas.
As the November 2026 election approaches, investors should monitor developments related to this proposed amendment, as its passage could alter the financial landscape for real estate transactions and development in California.
Questions? Contact the TIG Team!
Click on a contact card below to email one of our team members directly.
