Measure ULA Faces Renewed Scrutiny
Los Angeles officials are once again evaluating Measure ULA as public discussions resume around possible changes to the city’s controversial transfer tax policy. The measure, which took effect in 2023, has become one of the most closely watched issues in the multifamily investment landscape due to its impact on large property transactions throughout the city.
Often referred to as the “mansion tax,” Measure ULA imposes additional transfer taxes on property sales above designated price thresholds. While initially framed around luxury residential transactions, the policy also applies to multifamily, mixed-use, and commercial properties — significantly affecting apartment investors, developers, and institutional owners operating in Los Angeles.
As part of the latest review process, housing industry stakeholders are continuing to advocate for exemptions on multifamily housing transactions and encouraging the city to prioritize direct rental assistance over litigation-related tenant programs. Supporters of reform argue that adjusting the policy could help stimulate housing production and improve investment activity while still supporting housing stability initiatives.
Concerns Over Investment and Development Activity Persist
Critics of Measure ULA have long argued that the added transfer taxes create challenges for apartment transactions, refinancing strategies, and new development feasibility. Developers and investors say the tax has contributed to slower deal flow and reduced appetite for large-scale projects within Los Angeles city limits, particularly as construction costs and financing pressures remain elevated.
A previous reform proposal introduced at the city level sought to exempt newly constructed multifamily, mixed-use, and commercial developments from the tax for a limited period in an effort to encourage new housing production. While the proposal did not advance earlier this year, discussions surrounding potential revisions remain active as city leaders continue gathering public input.
For multifamily operators, the broader concern centers on how transaction costs influence long-term investment decisions. Higher transfer taxes can affect acquisition pricing, project underwriting, disposition timing, and redevelopment economics — all of which play a role in determining whether capital continues flowing into the LA apartment market.
Housing Goals and Market Realities Continue to Collide
Supporters of Measure ULA maintain that the policy has generated substantial funding for affordable housing initiatives, homelessness prevention programs, and tenant protections. Since implementation, the measure has produced significant revenue for city housing-related programs, reinforcing support among tenant advocates and housing activists.
At the same time, opponents argue the tax may be unintentionally slowing the pace of housing development at a time when Los Angeles continues to face severe supply constraints. That tension between funding affordable housing programs and encouraging new housing production remains at the center of the ongoing policy debate.
For apartment investors and multifamily owners, any future revisions to Measure ULA could have meaningful implications for transaction volume, development pipelines, and overall investment sentiment across the Los Angeles market.
Questions? Contact the TIG Team!
Click on a contact card below to email one of our team members directly.
